<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>In pursuit of The Idea - Latest Comments in Open source and your Mac</title><link>http://jurecuhalev.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:27:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open source and your Mac</title><link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2008/02/23/open-source-and-your-mac/#comment-2818729</link><description>Žiga: thanks for clarifaying this. I think we'll see some progress here also with porting of Konqueror to OS X</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jure Cuhalev</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open source and your Mac</title><link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2008/02/23/open-source-and-your-mac/#comment-2818730</link><description>Hey Jure, just a tiny comment regarding slide no. 5... :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it's that simple, then why doesn't Apple just opensource the whole browser? Yes, it's not that simple. Actually, it would be better to say something like "Safari = KHTML + Cocoa + Secret Internal APIs".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is using lots of secret internal APIs, which provide a way for them to communicate to different revisions of Mac OS X. This approach isn't opensource friendly, nor is it that different from what was Microsoft doing in the late 90's.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Žiga Sancin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:33:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>